Hi! On Son, 19 Mai 2002 14:28:01 Pixel wrote:
> it used to be "unsafe" to use dosfsck. That's why it was better not to > check fat's. This may have changed (i don't see any mention of danger > in dosfsck) Well, ok, dosfsck says, it's still alpha for fat32. And it is probably wise to let windows destroy itself and not risk a possible problem because of a bug in dosfsck... so not checking fat partitions automatically is ok for me. If mandrake doesn't want those symlinks to dosfsck (which I can understand), it would be nice if there would be a small fsck.vfat tool saying something like: "use dosfsck if you really want to check a fat partition, this might destroy it". Then everyone knows, what to do :) Thanks. -- Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mr.uue.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
