> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:32:14 +0200 > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The new display of packages going to be installed line by line is > > fine, and make easier to track what is going to change. However, > > sortig this list would make it better again :-) > > And even nicer still would then be to have the pkgs dled and installed > in the same order as listed :-) >
You can't have both. You can't (always) install them in alphabetical order without breaking dependencies. And urpmi can't check _all_ dependencies so there is no guarantee that installation won't fail. -andrej
