Hi,
On Sat, 2002-07-06 at 17:31, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please tell me how to reliably reproduce that? The crash
> looks nice and would be great to get the actual params chain given to
> the gmp library. I will try to have a look on that one too.
>
> Bye,
> Gwenole
Found something else that may be helpful. Calling the (random) function
directly in the rep LISP interpreter creates an error message quite
similar to the one caused indirectly by sawfish. To reproduce, type on
the cmdline:
rep
(random)
gives the following output:
---------------------------------------------------------------
randraw.c:118: GNU MP assertion failed: ((mp_limb_t) 1 << m2exp) > c
rep: received fatal signal: Aborted
struct debug_buf common:
Backtrace in `fatal_signal_handler':
<(null)+2431560>
<abort+395>
<(null)+1960586>
<(null)+1963532>
<__gmp_rand+299>
<__gmpz_urandomm+221>
<(null)+1594657>
<(null)+1512417>
Lisp backtrace:
#9 random ()
#8 eval ...
#7 repl-eval ...
#6 repl-iterate ...
#5 call-with-exception-handler ...
#4 repl ...
#3 run-byte-code ...
#1 make-structure (() #<closure 8057938> #<closure 805794c> user)
Aborted
--
Eric
