> On 18 Jul 2002 19:15:46 +0200 > Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Strangely enough, Both dvd.conf exists as does the symlink > > > /dev/dvd->hdc. > > > wierd. (it has been doing this for several installs now.) > > > > hum, rawdevices service may be started to soon after devfsd is run? > > so it seems, my rc5.d has S56rawdevices and S99devfsd, reversing that > order and one gets [ OK ] on rawdevices >
I bet you do REGISTER hdc ... I already said once it is questionable. /dev/hdc is compatibility link managed by devfsd and it is NEVER registered. The reason it appears to work is when S99devfsd HUPs devfsd it walks down /dev and _simulates_ REGISTER event for every node found. But you cannot rely on it. Actually you cannot even rely on the /dev/hdc existence. I guess devfssymlink should resolve compatibility names and put true devfs names in configuration, like REGISTER ide/... -andrej
