>>yes yes... I'm aware of that, but Mozilla.org is not exactly "on time" >>with there releases. Hopefully they have changed, but they have no track >>record of releasing on time. 1.0 was late, but good. I suspect the same >>with 1.1, late but good. The problem is 1.1 isn't ready yet, and the >>"ideal release" date has come and gone. If they are "on time" just like >>like thier other releases (1.1 alpha nad beta) we can expect thier 1.1 >>final in 3 days. That's fine., but leavs little time for testing for >>mandrake and us. > > > If you were reading mozillazine and mozilla newsgroup, you would know that > release candidate of Mozilla 1.1 are out and 1.1 should ship probably next > monday or tuesday..
Like I said, final should be out in 3 days.... > Guys, you are incredible : for Mdk 8.2, I was bashed because I didn't > include Moz 0.9.8 (and I was right, there was a lot of regressions > compared to Moz 0.9.7 we shipped).. > > And now that we will ship Moz 1.1, we are bashed because it is too recent > (even if it has passed both alpha and beta stage).. You are never happy and > I'm becoming a little upset by this kind of behaviour.. You didn't release with 0.9.8 because you didn't have enough time to test it... I don't want the same thing to happen with mozilla 1.1 where we end up with mozilla-crap-o-rama-beta-rc because they took too long and you don't have time to test the final. You didn't ship with 0.9.8 becasue it was to close to a release... And I'm fine with that. I understand. I'm letting you know that the current mozilla (whatever version) is crap, and crashes all the time. And I also understand you need time to test the RC or final... > Did you see any Release Candidate of Mandrake Linux recently ? There won't > be "final" Mdk 9.0 until at least some RC are out.. My main concern is having a mozilla - whatever the version is - stable. And I'm on this list to test, for myself, and you. -- Bryan Whitehead SysAdmin - JPL - Interferometry Systems and Technology Phone: 818 354 2903 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
