Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If i've compiled a pkg to "*.athlon.rpm" and installed it, rpmdrake > > still shows that I can "upgrade" this package from a "*.i586.rpm" that > > has the same version and build number. > > Still, same answer, perl-URPM/urpmi are reporting that... > Francois?
Yes, I undertstand what the problem may be. It could be seen as best architecture whereas rpm is not so happy with this distinction urpmi do. François.
