Le Mercredi 2 Octobre 2002 01:05, Oden Eriksson a écrit : > On onsdagen den 2 oktober 2002 02.46 Ben Reser wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:15:40AM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > 2.50 isn't a release version. It's a nightly CVS build. So if you're > > going to put it in it really ought to be listed as a pre-release or > > named "hackspamassassin" > > Why? Cooker = Devel, not?
He want to said 0.pre1 as release tag is better, and he is right. This remove doubt about the state of soft (from cvs, pre-release or stable). As he answered to himself, it is tag as 0.1mdk. I don't know the better way, I don't know if the next stable version will be tag as 2.50 or highter... but release will be 1mdk. Cooker is the devel of distro, that's why I packaged it as it, but it is not for testing apps. If I compare to debian, we don't have a really 'unstable version' of mandrake, and actuall cooker will be 9.1 in about six month. If the stable release of application is not out before, we'll have a unstable software in stable distro, this is not a good thing. Of course spamassassins is not a problem. I hope you understand me... hard for me to explain in english. -- Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL. Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/
