Leon Brooks wrote: > On Thursday 30 January 2003 04:33 am, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > >>Anyone disagree? > > > Yeah. (-: > > Despite the confusion it entails, there are a lot of long-term benefits to > having several disparate approaches and some decentralisation. Willing > co-operation between the `outliers' so that (for example) PLF and Texstar > RPMs are always interoperable would be nice, though.
I think PLF will have to be realistic and rather start adding Obsoletes tags to stuff like kdemoreartwork-liquid (for mosfet-liquid or whatever Tex calls it). > > The PLF page with all of the natty URPMI stuff is here, IMHO Mandrake should > have something similar for their own stuff: > > http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php # urpmi urpmi.setup # urpmi.setup (Doesn't work behind an authenticating proxy though, I want to know how to setup a urpmi.setup source so I can host one internally here for other students ...) Buchan -- |--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
