On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:02, François Pons wrote: > > It looks like some of these are basically bogus; e.g. I don't have > > libglib2.0-devel, because it's libglib-2.0_0-devel... > > > > What's going on? > > I don't see any problem, what is wrong ? beware that libglib2.O-devel > may be a virtual provide (ie not a package name), furthermore, if you > encounter a bug, please send me a bug report.
Hmm, disregard...I just did a fresh update / auto-select cycle and it works now. The mirror must have been halfway through a package update or something, I guess. -- adamw
