I agree *aol'er* ;p to Han ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yves Duret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:06 PM Subject: why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk)
> Buchan Milne wrote: > > >Laurent MONTEL wrote: > > > > > >>--=-=-= > >>Name : mdkkdm Relocations: (not relocateable) > >>Version : 9.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > >>Release : 1mdk Build Date: Mon Feb 3 11:53:49 200 > >> > > >>Does this mean we get normal kdm back? If so, thanks! > >> > >>Buchan > >> > >> > >> > why have this been renamed as mdkkdm ?? > Once upon a time, people tried to make mandrake specific RPMs more > coherent, either by the name or by the numbering scheme... > For the moment, we have > drakfoo (or foodrake sometimes) for drakxtools-like tools > mandrake-foo for others such as mime, desktop, menu and so and so on. > > thus why changing this defacto policy ? > i suggest to rename it mandrake-kdm. > >
