torsdagen den 13 februari 2003 11.08 skrev Buchan Milne: > Oden Eriksson wrote: > > torsdagen den 13 februari 2003 10.49 skrev Buchan Milne: > >>Hmmm, just when I went and made the festival srpm have seperate binary > >>packages, and had it ready to upload! > > > > Hey, as long as it works. > > I would prefer to have working headers. I do not know if there are apps > that use the libraries (many seem to just pipe text into festival > --tts), but if there are we might as well do it now.
Wise. > >>OK, I have now working voices (festvox, to use the name of the tarballs) > >>and dictionary (festlex, same reason) packages. All festvox packages > >>provide festival-voice (and some more such as festival-voice-english, > >>festival-voice-en_UK etc), and festival requires festival-voice. The > >>voice packages require the dictionary packages they need. urpmi prompts > >>to choose the festvox package, only thing is it seems festival does not > >>start up without the kal diphone, so I might have to require that. Just > >>need to split off the non-free voices into a seperate srpm and we are > >>ready ... > > > > Cool! > > > > To be honest it sounds like greek to me as I don't know how to use any of > > this stuff... Do we have any blind listeners and experts here who could > > shed some light on this festival stuff? > > On the plf list is someone working on the accessibility stuff in KDE who > also requested this go into contrib, so I think he should be able to > test ... Cool, we/you might get some input if and when a blind impaired listener comes forward, maybe privately. > >>But I will take a look at the pld stuff now ... > > > > There where some interesting patches in there. > > I am more interested at the moment in their scripts to fix the #includes > in festival to make it compile against speech tools headers ... Ok, cool. I back off and let you work in peace. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
