Desiree Miloshevic <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Christian 
>
> As you know the RIPE NCC is neutral, however community members can contribute 
> their views to the ongoing consultation.
>
> This might be a good opportunity to reactivate the small task group via the 
> cooperation working group and contribute to the consultation?
>
> Roman’s suggestion for the RIPE NCC to organise an Open house meeting in June 
> is also
> a good suggestion.
>

 Berec seemed quite discombobulated. So yes keeping tabs on developments
 is good. 
>
> Best
> Desiree
> —
>
>
>
>> On 2 Apr 2026, at 13:15, Christian de Larrinaga via cooperation-wg 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Will RIPE be preparing a submission on the IP community's take on the
>> Commission's policy approach?
>> 
>> Given RIPE NCC covers a larger geographical and political and technical
>> community than the EU Commission.
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> 
>> Romain Bosc <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> Dear colleagues
>>> 
>>> BEREC published its preliminary assessment of the DNA proposal -- see here:
>>> https://www.berec.europa.eu/en/news/press-releases/berec-provides-early-assessment-of-the-digital-networks-act-welcoming-ambition-while-highlighting-areas-for-improvement?language_content_entity=en
>>> 
>>> 
>>> BEREC will work on a deeper assessment, which should be published around 
>>> June.
>>> 
>>> This could be a good timing to organise a second Open House on the topic.
>>> 
>>> All best, Romain
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 07:39, Hisham Ibrahim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello Tahar et al., and thanks Desiree for bringing this to the list.
>>> 
>>> While what I will say is well understood by many in the community, it's 
>>> still helpful to keep in mind the dual role the
>>> RIPE NCC plays, and the boundaries that are necessary for those roles to 
>>> function effectively.
>>> 
>>> The RIPE NCC has a responsibility to support and defend Internet technical 
>>> coordination: to explain how the
>>> Internet’s core works technically, why open standards and neutral 
>>> coordination and registration of Internet
>>> Number Resources matter, and why global interoperability is a prerequisite 
>>> for innovation, competition, and
>>> sustainable development. This includes engagement with IGOs, governments, 
>>> and regulators across our service, as
>>> well as institutions at EU and national level, and contributing technical 
>>> expertise and operational reality to policy
>>> discussions.
>>> 
>>> For those who are interested, the positions and submissions the RIPE NCC 
>>> has made to UN, EU, and broader
>>> Internet governance processes are publicly available on the RIPE NCC 
>>> website.
>>> 
>>> https://www.ripe.net/community/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engagement/ripe-ncc-contributions-to-external-consultations/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> At the same time, the RIPE NCC also serves as the secretariat to the RIPE 
>>> community. In that role, it does not act as
>>> a political actor or lobby on behalf of the community. Instead, it enables 
>>> bottom-up, community-led processes,
>>> provides factual and technical input, and supports the outcomes that the 
>>> community itself develops through its
>>> Working Groups.
>>> 
>>> On “Fair Share” specifically, we’ve seen a strong example of this 
>>> community-led approach already: this Working
>>> Group convened a small task team (through an open call) that produced a 
>>> substantive response to the European
>>> Commission’s consultation (May 2023). That piece of work came directly out 
>>> of the WG, drawing on community
>>> expertise, and the RIPE NCC supported the process in its secretariat role.
>>> 
>>> https://www.ripe.net/media/documents/RIPE_Cooperation_Working_Group_Small_Task_Team_response_to_the_European_Commis_V5kMzDp.pdf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is why I agree with Julf's point: this Working Group is precisely the 
>>> right place for the community to come
>>> together, assess policy developments like “Fair Share”, and articulate 
>>> shared concerns or principles grounded in
>>> technical and operational realities. When the community develops a common 
>>> position, the RIPE NCC can fully
>>> support that work in its role as secretariat including by helping ensure 
>>> those perspectives are understood in
>>> relevant policy forums.
>>> 
>>> The RIPE NCC can also offer the co-chairs the option to organize open 
>>> houses or similar online sessions on these
>>> topics as an extension to the discussion on the mailing list and at the 
>>> RIPE meetings, should that be useful for
>>> broadening participation and engagement across the community.
>>> 
>>> https://www.ripe.net/meetings/open-house/
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Hisham Ibrahim
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 12:47, Johan Helsingius via cooperation-wg 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 23/01/2026 10:11 pm, Tahar Schaa wrote:
>>>> I am firmly convinced that the RIPE NCC as an organization and the RIPE
>>>> community must finally become significantly more politically active and
>>>> engage in more lobbying, because the mechanisms are what they are.
>>>> 
>>>> If you only concern yourself with IPv6 address allocation schemes,
>>>> routing policies, and open-source repositories with cool code (which I
>>>> much prefer), then you shouldn't be surprised when the EU Commission
>>>> ignores you as an organization and regularly makes terrible decisions.
>>>> 
>>>> Someone has to go to those canapé receptions...
>>> 
>>> Seems RIPE NCC needs to get better at promoting their work on
>>> interaction with the EU. They do go to some of those canapé
>>> receptions, and even organize some of their own, such as the
>>> annual Government Roundtable in Brussels, where the chairs
>>> of this WG also try to attend.
>>> 
>>> But yes, this is very much what this WG is all about.
>>> 
>>>         Julf
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
>>> please visit:
>>> https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/cooperation-wg.ripe.net/
>>> As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with 
>>> the email matching your
>>> subscription before you can change your settings.
>>> More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
>>> please visit:
>>> https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/cooperation-wg.ripe.net/
>>> As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with 
>>> the email matching your subscription
>>> before you can change your settings.
>>> More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription
>>> options, please visit:
>>> https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/cooperation-wg.ripe.net/
>>> As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account
>>> with the email matching your subscription before you can change your
>>> settings.
>>> More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
>> 
>> --
>> Christian de Larrinaga
>> -----
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription
>> options, please visit:
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/cooperation-wg.ripe.net/
>> As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account
>> with the email matching your subscription before you can change your
>> settings.
>> More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

-- 
Christian de Larrinaga
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/cooperation-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the 
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. 
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

Reply via email to