I agree in principle, however from my experience, a little initial structure goes a long way - e.g. this page is for cooperation in education, this for science etc. An example being http://metacollab.net - while i started this site years ago and haven't had the time to shepherd it properly as of late, the structure radiating out from the home page has enabled people to contribute in drips an drops, but consistently over the years....
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Robert Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:08:49PM -0400, Stephan Dohrn wrote: > > another resource to search for papers and authors: > http://ideas.repec.org/; > > Whuff! 1622 results for a title search for the word "cooperation". > > The interest is there, the people are there, we just need to figure out > how to serve them. I'm about ready to say the best way is invite them > all to wade into the wiki to collaborate on a curriculum. > > > > -- ----- Mark Elliott, PhD Director, CollabForge pty ltd collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software http://collabforge.com ~ http://mark-elliott.net/ ~ http://metacollab.net/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CooperationCommons" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CooperationCommons?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
