Hi Sérgio, On Monday, October 10, 2016 5:45:02 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other branched > repos ? Please . > > Thanks !
What is wrong with F25 at this point? Pavel > > On Seg, 2016-10-10 at 16:39 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > > The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26. > > I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from > > /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ to /results/*/*/fedora-26- > > $basearch/ > > so that no links are lost. > > There will be no need to rebuild any existing builds. > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski <mizde...@redhat.com > > > wrote: > > > On 10/06/2016 08:55 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I want to highlight > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790 > > > > > > > > Right now we have rawhide target and when new chroot (e.g. F26) > > > we copy everything from rawhide to F26. > > > > > > > > This RFE as for the reverse. I.e. there is no rawhide at all. > > > Rawhide is named F26 and when there is branching of F26 we > > > > add new chroot named F27. > > > > > > > > I would love to hear your comments. > > > > > > I have a strong opinion against that proposal. IMHO rawhide chroot > > > in > > > Copr should have fixed name, repo URLs etc. Builds done years ago > > > should > > > still be available. Other services in Fedora use a similar > > > approach: > > > PkgDB has "Fedora devel" collection, dist-git has "master" branch, > > > Koji > > > has "rawhide" repo and build target and so on. Developers who > > > focus > > > their development work on rawhide don't even need to know or care > > > about > > > branching. > > > > > > Personally, I mostly care about rawhide. Some of my Copr projects > > > that I > > > still use were created about 2.5 years ago, but they are still > > > rawhide-only. It seems like with this proposal I would have to > > > remember > > > to switch chroots in Copr and fix repo URLs in all the places where > > > I > > > use them. > > > > > > What would happen with builds? For me the idea of re-running them, > > > in > > > correct order, re-bootstrapping, fixing FTBFS etc. sounds a lot > > > like > > > asking users to move away from Copr to something else (or switch to > > > using custom-1 chroot with rawhide repos). > > > > > > -- > > > Mikolaj Izdebski > > > Software Engineer, Red Hat > > > IRC: mizdebsk > > > _______________________________________________ > > > copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted > > > .org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.o > > rg > _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
