By aren't I meant that most of CSSU replacements for closed bits aren't QT-based. BTW, what do "we" think about osso-xterm? AFAIK it's FOSS. Would it be suitable?
2012/5/5, Tomasz Sterna <to...@xiaoka.com>: > Dnia 2012-05-05, sob o godzinie 14:34 +0200, twilight...@gmail.com > pisze: >> Most parts aren't, > > aren't ...? > >> why we can't use QT things? Technical or ideological restrain? > > Cordia is GNOME based. > We won't be delivering Qt in the base system, so base system components > cannot depend on Qt. > > There is no problem in building Qt apps for Cordia though. > Qt will be downloadable from the repos (as Mer packages it). > > > -- > Tomasz Sterna > Instant Messaging Consultant : Open Source Developer > http://tomasz.sterna.tv/ http://www.xiaoka.com/portfolio > > > >
