[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghu Angadi updated HADOOP-3416:
---------------------------------
Component/s: dfs
Description:
When the first datanode's write to second datanode fails or times out DFSClient
ends up marking first datanode as the bad one and removes it from the pipeline.
Similar problem exists on DataNode as well and it is fixed in HADOOP-3339. From
HADOOP-3339 :
"The main issue is that BlockReceiver thread (and DataStreamer in the case of
DFSClient) interrupt() the 'responder' thread. But interrupting is a pretty
coarse control. We don't know what state the responder is in and interrupting
has different effects depending on responder state. To fix this properly we
need to redesign how we handle these interactions."
When the first datanode closes its socket from DFSClient, DFSClient should
properly read all the data left in the socket.. Also, DataNode's closing of the
socket should not result in a TCP reset, otherwise I think DFSClient will not
be able to read from the socket.
was:
When the first datanode's write to second datanode fails or times out DFSClient
ends up marking first datanode as the bad one and removes it from the pipeline.
Similar problem exists on DataNode as well and it is fixed in HADOOP-3339. From
HADOOP-3339 :
"The main issue is that BlockReceiver thread (and DataStreamer in the case of
DFSClient) interrupt() the 'responder' thread. But interrupting is a pretty
coarse control. We don't know what state the responder is in and interrupting
has different effects depending on responder state. To fix this properly we
need to redesign how we handle these interactions."
When the first datanode closes its socket from DFSClient, DFSClient should
properly read all the data left in the socket.. Also, DataNode's closing of the
socket should not result in a TCP reset, otherwise I think DFSClient will not
be able to read from the socket.
> DFS write pipeline : DFSClient sometimes does not detect second datanode
> failure
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3416
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3416
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.16.0
> Reporter: Raghu Angadi
>
> When the first datanode's write to second datanode fails or times out
> DFSClient ends up marking first datanode as the bad one and removes it from
> the pipeline. Similar problem exists on DataNode as well and it is fixed in
> HADOOP-3339. From HADOOP-3339 :
> "The main issue is that BlockReceiver thread (and DataStreamer in the case of
> DFSClient) interrupt() the 'responder' thread. But interrupting is a pretty
> coarse control. We don't know what state the responder is in and interrupting
> has different effects depending on responder state. To fix this properly we
> need to redesign how we handle these interactions."
> When the first datanode closes its socket from DFSClient, DFSClient should
> properly read all the data left in the socket.. Also, DataNode's closing of
> the socket should not result in a TCP reset, otherwise I think DFSClient will
> not be able to read from the socket.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
