[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12614247#action_12614247
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3677:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12386129/HADOOP-3677-trunk.patch
against trunk revision 677470.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2885/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2885/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2885/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2885/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Problems with generation stamp upgrade
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3677
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.18.0
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Assignee: Raghu Angadi
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.18.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-3677-branch-018.patch, HADOOP-3677-trunk.patch,
> HADOOP-3677-trunk.patch
>
>
> # The generation stamp upgrade renames blocks' meta-files so that the name
> contains the block generation stamp as stated in HADOOP-2656.
> If a data-node has blocks that do not belong to any files and the name-node
> asks the data-node to remove those blocks
> during or before the upgrade started the data-node will remove the blocks but
> not the meta-files because their names
> are still in the old format which is not recognized by the new code. So we
> can end up with a number of garbage files which
> will be hard to recognize that they are unused and the system will never
> remove them automatically.
> I think this should be handled by the upgrade code in the end, but may be it
> will be right to fix HADOOP-3002 for the 0.18 release,
> which will avoid scheduling block removal when the name-node is in safe-mode.
> # I was not able to get the upgrade -force option to work. This option lets
> the name-node proceed with a distributed upgrade even if
> the data-nodes are not able to complete their local upgrades. Did we test
> this feature at all for the generation stamp upgrade?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
