[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634358#action_12634358
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-4116:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12390875/balancerRM2.patch
against trunk revision 698721.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity.
-1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3365/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3365/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3365/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3365/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Balancer should provide better resource management
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-4116
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4116
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.17.0
> Reporter: Raghu Angadi
> Assignee: Hairong Kuang
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.18.2, 0.19.0
>
> Attachments: balancerRM.patch, balancerRM1.patch,
> balancerRM2-b18.patch, balancerRM2.patch
>
>
> The number of threads are currently limited on datanodes. Once these threads
> are occupied, DataNode does not accept any more requests (DOS). Recently we
> saw a case where most of the 256 threads were waiting in
> {{DataXceiver.replaceBlock()}} trying to acquire {{balancingSem}}. Since
> rebalancing is (heavily) throttled, I would think this would be the common
> case.
> These operations waiting for active rebalancing threads to finish need not
> take up a thread.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
