[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645687#action_12645687
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3121:
-----------------------------------
+1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393479/HADOOP-3121.patch
against trunk revision 712033.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3545/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3545/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3545/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/3545/console
This message is automatically generated.
> dfs -lsr fail with "Could not get listing "
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3121
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 0.16.1
> Reporter: Koji Noguchi
> Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.18.3
>
> Attachments: 3121_20081105.patch, 3121_20081106.patch,
> 3121_20081106b.patch, HADOOP-3121.patch
>
>
> (This happened a lot when namenode was extremely slow due to some other
> reasons.)
> % hadoop dfs -lsr /
> failed with
> > Could not get listing for /aaa/bbb/randomfile
> It's probably because file was deleted between items = fs.listStatus( and
> ls(items[i]
> I think lsr should ignore this case and continue.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
