Am 25.03.2010 22:27, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:41, Ulf Zibis<ulf.zi...@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 23.03.2010 19:19, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
Ulf,
Please do not delete methods in Surrogate.java
(because we take compatibility seriously)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/isBMPCodePoint
I still think, we should stick on Surrogate#isBMP for above compatibility
reason.
Otherwise we too should rename #neededFor etc.
The difference is that isBMP was not provided with any officially supported JDK
(i.e. Sun JDK 6). We take compatibility seriously, but not that seriously :)
You're right.
So we can make it private, and no one would come to the idea to use it
in-advisedly.
$ rg -l '@author.*Zibis'
./src/share/classes/java/lang/Character.java
./src/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java
./src/share/classes/java/lang/String.java
./src/share/classes/sun/nio/cs/Surrogate.java
Thanks,
-Ulf
