Approved! Does this mean that the jar index feature may get some much needed love in the future?
Martin On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:38, Xueming Shen <xueming.s...@oracle.com> wrote: > Martin, > > Another cleanup. The jar manual [1] clearly indicates the options "cuxti" > are exclusive with each > other. The check code was missed when the "i" was added in. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/4690407/webrev > > Please help review. > > #Issue of "-i0" mentioned in the description (tracked in a separate > CR#4823701) is no longer reproducible. > > Thanks, > Sherman > > [1]http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/jar.html >
