Le 06/12/2010 08:35, Joe Darcy a écrit :
Hi Peter.

[...]

Off-list, Alan found the a related closed test and Stuart and I have developed an explicit test that tickles this bug:

   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/6990094.1/

I plan to shortly push the fix with the test, although the test might be renamed or tweaked first,

Thanks,

-Joe

Hi Joe,
In the test, I don't see why the replacement field has to be static in Resolver.
In my opinion, a private final field is sufficient.

Rémi

Reply via email to