Stuart Marks wrote:
:

The key issue seems to be whether we want to preserve compatibility of the serialized form. If we care about compatibility of the serialized form, #3 is probably the safest. If somebody comes along and tells us that we don't have to worry about serial compatibility of this stuff at all, then #1 is probably the best since it simplifies the code a lot.
I think (and Peter can say for sure) that the compatibility issue is really only for the case that rmid needs to recover from an existing log file. Without more insight then I tend to agree that #3 is the best for now.

-Alan.

Reply via email to