On 04/28/2011 01:55 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 28.04.2011 21:56, schrieb Xueming Shen:
That said, you do have the point, we should do better even in
malformed case, ...
Yes, that's what I wanted to point on.
But I thought, you could go 1 step further, declaring bb as member of
UTF_8.Decoder. Then it should be guaranteed, the a decoder is in use
of only one thread at same time. Don't know if that is the case for
the typical use cases?
Why do you want to "re-use" a ByteBuffer object cross decode(byte[]...)
invocations?
I don't see any benefit of doing that.
In http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/4884238/2/webrev/ I've seen the
change to use a constant Charset object instead of a constant charset
name on some method calls. From your benchmark it seems, using
constant charset names has some little performance gain (0..25 %) , so
I don't see the benefit of the changes from 4884238 in contrary
direction.
That is a totally different topic:-)
Yes, you don't benefit from using a "Charset object" when do
String.getBytes()/toCharArray()
because of our caching optimization in StringCoding class. But that is a
pure implementation
detail. It's safe to say that java.nio.cs.StandardCharset is not for
String.getBytes()/toCharArray()
only, so the fact that "cs" variant of String.getBytes()/toCharArray()
is "slower" than its "csn"
variant arguably might not be a very strong/supportive material for that
discussion:-)
-Sherman
-Ulf
