On Nov 16, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
>
> The jtreg tests that use othervm along with a timeout argument should be
> fairly reliable in getting a consistent result. The tests that did not specify
> othervm may run into problems, if they are run concurrently with other tests.
>
> Here's a quick sampling of the java/util and java/lang tests that might have
> issues.
> Would there be any harm in changing these to designate running in othervm
> mode?
My general feeling is 'No harm', looking at this list (somewhat short anyway)
these tests seem like
good candidates to be othervm tests anyway. but that's just my opinion.
-kto
>
> find jdk/test/java/{util,lang} -type f |grep -v hg/|xargs grep -n @run |grep
> timeout |egrep -v "othervm|shell"
>
> jdk/test/java/util/ResourceBundle/Bug4168625Test.java:27: @run
> main/timeout=600 Bug4168625Test
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=7000 CancelledProducerConsumerLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/MultipleProducersSingleConsumerLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=3600 MultipleProducersSingleConsumerLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/ProducerConsumerLoops.java:38: *
> @run main/timeout=3600 ProducerConsumerLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/SingleProducerMultipleConsumerLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=600 SingleProducerMultipleConsumerLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/MapCheck.java:38: * @run
> main/timeout=240 MapCheck
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/MapLoops.java:38: * @run
> main/timeout=1600 MapLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/Exchanger/ExchangeLoops.java:38: * @run
> main/timeout=720 ExchangeLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/ExecutorCompletionService/ExecutorCompletionServiceLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=3600 ExecutorCompletionServiceLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask/CancelledFutureLoops.java:38: * @run
> main/timeout=2000 CancelledFutureLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/CancelledLockLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=2800 CancelledLockLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/LockOncePerThreadLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=15000 LockOncePerThreadLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/SimpleReentrantLockLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=4500 SimpleReentrantLockLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantReadWriteLock/MapLoops.java:38:
> * @run main/timeout=4700 MapLoops
> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock.java:32: * @run main/timeout=15
> LoggingDeadlock
> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock2.java:31: * @run main/timeout=15
> LoggingDeadlock2
> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock3.java:30: * @run main/timeout=80
> LoggingDeadlock3
> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock4.java:30: * @run main/timeout=15
> LoggingDeadlock4
> jdk/test/java/util/zip/ZipFile/ManyEntries.java:27: * @run main/timeout=600
> ManyEntries
> jdk/test/java/lang/annotation/AnnotationTypeMismatchException/FoundType.java:29:
> * @run main/timeout=30 FoundType
> jdk/test/java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/CollectionUsageThreshold.java:34:
> * @run main/timeout=300 CollectionUsageThreshold
>
