Looks fine to me. Xuelei
On 11/16/2012 10:54 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: > This change affects components in the security and core libs areas. > > This is a minor specification clarification to avoid the use of the terms > "valid" and "invalid" when describing the syntax for wildcard names in > java.security.BasicPermission and various subclasses. This could be implied > that > these wildcard names are illegal and the constructors should throw an > exception. > However, they are acceptable, but simply won't be treated as wildcards by the > implies method when matching against other permissions. > > bug : http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7167056 > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/7167056/webrev.00/ > > Thanks, > Sean >
