A webrev for the changes going into 7u12 is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8003322/webrev.jdk7.00/
Thanks, /Staffan On 20 nov 2012, at 18:30, Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 11/20/12 6:20 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: >> On 20/11/2012 14:10, Staffan Larsen wrote: >>> : >>> The original plan was for the code in this review to go into both 8 and >>> 7u12. Since 7u12 has a tighter deadline, a possible path would be to >>> include it only in 7u12, but not in 8. For 8 we would then implement a >>> fully dynamic solution. The only thing needed in 8 from this review would >>> be the path field added to the stream classes. Does that sound like a plan? >>> >> I think this is a good plan. I suggest bringing it up on jdk7u-dev so that >> the jdk7u maintainers can think about the issue (rather that trying to get >> approval at the last minute when you are reading to push). > > This sounds a good plan to me too. This would take the pressure off 7u12 > deadline while a better solution will be implemented for 8. > > Mandy
