Shouldn't 'cal.set(1970, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0)' be inside the for loop?
The test can simply throw Exception, rather can catching. Otherwise, looks fine to me. -Crhis. On 06/12/2012 21:19, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks, According to HttpCookie.java: """ There are 3 http cookie specifications: Netscape draft RFC 2109 -/http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2109.txt/ RFC 2965 -/http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965.txt/ HttpCookie class can accept all these 3 forms of syntax. """ According to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2109.txt section 10.1.2: """ Netscape's original proposal defined an Expires header that took a date value in a fixed-length variant format in place of Max-Age: Wdy, DD-Mon-YY HH:MM:SS GMT """ Thats in the "Historical" section provided to allow for compatibility with Netscape's implementation, which we also support: (as per http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/HttpCookie.html ) While we don't support the rfc explicitly, this change follows the format specified in section 5.1.1 of rfc 6265: """ 3. If the year-value is greater than or equal to 70 and less than or equal to 99, increment the year-value by 1900. 4. If the year-value is greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 69, increment the year-value by 2000. 1. NOTE: Some existing user agents interpret two-digit years differently. """ The webrev is at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8000525/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erobm/8000525/webrev.01/> Note: The addition of setLenient(false) has required changes to two existing testcases. -Rob
