Looks good! Mea culpa for some of those slow and flaky sleeps in this code, although they are tricky to avoid - there is no cross-process latches, for example.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Rob McKenna <[email protected]> wrote: > Simple enough fix but to be honest I'm not sure any value will *always* work > for the dead process waitFor(). Our testing infrastructure seems to glide > past whatever we consider to be acceptable tolerances. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8005618/webrev.01/ > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erobm/8005618/webrev.01/> > > -Rob
