Looks fine as far as I can see.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 1/24/2013 3:30 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
As far as Coleen and I are aware, this is internal-only. If anyone
knows otherwise, please comment before the end of tomorrow.
Other than that, do you see any problems, Joe?
On 01/24/13 15:41, Joe Darcy wrote:
If this function was only usable with the JDK implementation (an
internal JDK contract), then a ccc request is not needed.
HTH,
-Joe
On 1/24/2013 12:26 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I think the question was more of "does one need to be filed?"
On 01/24/13 15:15, Joe Darcy wrote:
There is as of yet no ccc request for 8006503.
-Joe
On 1/24/2013 12:11 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
Joe, can you comment on this?
On 01/24/13 14:59, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
What was the disposition of the CCC request? Was it decided not
to do
one because this function hasn't been used since before 1.4?
Code looks good to me. I removed the one in hotspot last week.
Thanks,
Coleen
On 01/24/2013 10:59 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
Hello,
Please review this trivial patch which removes JVM_PrintStackTrace
from
jvm.h. It is no longer being used.
The webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8006503/webrev.00/
The bug is here:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006503
Thanks,
Eric
