On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Xueming Shen <xueming.s...@oracle.com>wrote:
> ** > > The spec of both affected methods says "the char at the index is returned, > if > the following conditions are not true > > 1) hi-surrogate && > 2) next index < count && > 3) char at next is lo-surrogate > > So it is the right thing to do to simply return the char at index, if it > is the last > char in the buffer. > > Right. > Martin, the purpose of dup the code here is for better performance? > Yes.
