On Mar 21, 10:10am, marti...@google.com (Martin Buchholz) wrote: -- Subject: Re: RFR-8008118
| Please revert this formatting change: | | - for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++) | - ; | + for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++); | + | Stylistically I prefer: for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++) continue; so that re-formatting accidents don't happen, and the intent is clearly communicated. christos