On Mar 21, 10:10am, marti...@google.com (Martin Buchholz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: RFR-8008118

| Please revert this formatting change:
| 
| -        for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++)
| -            ;
| +        for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++);
| +
| 

Stylistically I prefer:

            for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++)
                    continue;

so that re-formatting accidents don't happen, and the intent is clearly
communicated.

christos

Reply via email to