Is "i+1" really preferred to "i + 1" ? I thought it was the reverse, and
that "i+1" was merely tolerated.
1570 if (value[i] == hi && value[i+1] == lo) {
---
2425 * @throws NullPointerException If {@code delimiter} is {@code null}
you also throw NPE for element null, but you didn't specify that.
*
*
*---*
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jim Gish <jim.g...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**jgish/Bugs-5015163-7175206-**
> 7172553/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bugs-5015163-7175206-7172553/><
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%**7Ejgish/Bugs-5015163-7175206-**7172553/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bugs-5015163-7175206-7172553/>
> >
>
> These are changes that we made in lambda that we're now bringing into JDK8.
>
> I've made a couple of additions - making StringJoiner final and adding a
> couple of constructors to set the emptyOutput chars.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304
> Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team
> 35 Network Drive
> Burlington, MA 01803
> jim.g...@oracle.com
>
>
