Thanks Peter this looks good to me.
One minor thing please set the correct copyright year in the test, it
should just be
Copyright (c) 2013, Oracle ...
I couldn't get the test to actually fail, but I can see that it could.
David
On 14/05/2013 9:04 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Ok, here's the corrected fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk8-tl/String.contentEquals/webrev.03/
I also added a reproducer for the bug.
Regards, peter
On 05/14/2013 07:53 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Right, sb.length() should be used. I will correct that as soon as I
get to the keyboard.
Regards, Peter
On May 14, 2013 7:22 AM, "David Holmes" <david.hol...@oracle.com
<mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Thanks Peter! I've filed
8014477
Race condition in String.contentEquals when comparing with
StringBuffer
On 14/05/2013 8:34 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 05/14/2013 12:09 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
I noticed a synchronization bug in String.contentEquals
method. If
called with a StringBuffer argument while concurrent thread is
modifying the StringBuffer, the method can either throw
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException or return true even though
the content
of the StringBuffer has never been the same as the String's.
Here's a proposed patch:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk8-tl/String.contentEquals/webrev.01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eplevart/jdk8-tl/String.contentEquals/webrev.01/>
Regards, Peter
Or even better (with some code clean-up):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk8-tl/String.contentEquals/webrev.02/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eplevart/jdk8-tl/String.contentEquals/webrev.02/>
This part is not correct I believe:
1010 private boolean
nonSyncContentEquals(AbstractStringBuilder sb) {
1011 char v1[] = value;
1012 char v2[] = sb.getValue();
1013 int n = v1.length;
1014 if (n != v2.length) {
1015 return false;
1016 }
v2 can be larger than v1 if v2 is not being fully used (ie count <
length).
David
-----
