On 24/05/2013 08:20, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 14:30 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Thomas,
Are we still waiting for a second core-libs reviewer on this?
Yes. Would some additional core-libs reviewer be so kind and look at
this issue?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/7038914/webrev.3/
Thomas
Only one reviewer is required but if you want a second then the proposed
change looks fine to me (and I'm happy the discussion got to the issue,
it wasn't initially clear). For the test then I guess I'd probably
rename it to ReferenceHandlerOOME but that's a minor comment.
-Alan
