(I've been distracted by other high priority stuff, and only starting to explore SR, sorry for dumb questions below)
On 07/11/2013 04:16 PM, Doug Lea wrote: > (I've been contemplating re-exploring alternatives in TLR, > but the options are more limited because it is a subclass > of Random. Which made sense at the time I did it, but ...) What exactly limits us to adopt the PRNG from SR into TLR, thus gaining the same good statistical properties? Does extending Random actually forces us to match the PRNG j.u.Random has? It does not seem likely if we don't control the seed for TLR anyway. -Aleksey.
