You are correct: it should be private - I'll fix that. Thanks,
Brian On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > It looks okay to me although the downside of this idiom is yet another class > (which I assume can private btw).
You are correct: it should be private - I'll fix that. Thanks,
Brian On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > It looks okay to me although the downside of this idiom is yet another class > (which I assume can private btw).