Looks fine; cheers,
-Joe
On 9/5/2013 3:46 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Please review this specification-only change to allow RMI activation
to be optional. RMI activation, unlike the rest of RMI, pretty much
requires the ability to fork processes at will. This causes
difficulties in certain situations, such as in small embedded
configurations. Activation is typically unnecessary in such
environments, hence it makes sense for it to be optional.
Essentially the change is the addition of a small paragraph to the
package doc for java.rmi.activation, and adding spec for throwing
UnsupportedOperationException to a bunch of methods in this package.
Bug report:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8023447
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8023447/webrev.5/
Specdiff:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8023447/specdiff.5/overview-summary.html
Thanks,
s'marks
