I would suggest leaving it at 1100 for this review (JDK7) and to 768 (0x003) in JDK8. The latter will require another issue to be filed.
On Sep 12, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote: > For me, it is the only consideration. > I'm sure in 768 because I proved it formally using ACL2 tool. > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:45 AM, David M. Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com>wrote: > >> If that's the only consideration then just use 0x300 instead, which is >> easier to read *and* makes more sense anyway, in the context of the test. >> >> >> On 09/12/2013 10:13 PM, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote: >> >>> Should we change conservative constant 1100 to optimal constant 768 ? >>> My opinion is no (in JDK7), because the constant 1100 has lower cost of >>> review. >>> I mean that chances that a reviewer approves 1100 are higher than chances >>> that [s]he approves 768.
