On 09/17/2013 11:33 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
The Map/Defaults.java changes only test HashMap. It should probably be extended 
to test most/all of the other implementations.

I have some worry that the superfluous assignment of the 
Objects.requireNonNull() result might have a non-negligible cost.

apart from
  foo(Object.requireNonNull(var))
or
  this.var = Objects.requireNonNull(var) in a constructor,

I think that
  Object.requireNonNull(var);
is more readable than
  var = Object.requireNonNull(var);

Also for HashMap, I think it's better to not use Object.requireNonNull
as the current code does otherwise we need to re-run all perf benchs we have.


Mike

Rémi


On Sep 17 2013, at 13:49 , Brian Burkhalter wrote:

Please review this proposed patch at your convenience.

Summary:        Explicitly check for null remappingFunction parameter (and 
clean up similar code for consistency).
Issue:          http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8024331
Webrev:         http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8024331/

Thanks,

Brian

Reply via email to