On 19/11/2013 12:09, Weijun Wang wrote:
I think it will require careful analysis to see what is possible (as there were several problems when this was pushed due to a dependency on the long standing behavior).b114: 1 my (previous) own build: 0I fetched changes for JDK-8028321 (the un-do) and now it's back to 1. So we are keeping this compatibility even if it does not look correct?
-Alan.
