Hi Stuart,
Looks good; thanks,
-Joe
On 12/3/2013 5:40 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following small javadoc change. The StringJoiner doc
for a couple methods uses "i.e." in the first sentence, which screws
up the javadoc logic that pulls the first sentence into the Method
Summary. This is an editorial change to fix this up; there is no
actual specification change.
Thanks!
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1386121046 28800
# Node ID 0bc91b9f6afd9b4dceea31ecd1036e367b365690
# Parent 75165f6c1c505ff43f7fd235a95b2e7955413b78
8029489: StringJoiner spec for setEmptyValue() and length() is
malformatted
Reviewed-by: XXX
diff -r 75165f6c1c50 -r 0bc91b9f6afd
src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java Tue Dec 03
17:25:28 2013 -0800
+++ b/src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java Tue Dec 03
17:37:26 2013 -0800
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
/**
* Sets the sequence of characters to be used when determining
the string
* representation of this {@code StringJoiner} and no elements
have been
- * added yet, i.e. when it is empty. A copy of the {@code
emptyValue}
+ * added yet, that is, when it is empty. A copy of the {@code
emptyValue}
* parameter is made for this purpose. Note that once an add
method has been
* called, the {@code StringJoiner} is no longer considered
empty, even if
* the element(s) added correspond to the empty {@code String}.
@@ -228,8 +228,8 @@
}
/**
- * The length of the {@code StringJoiner} value, i.e. the length of
- * {@code String} representation of the {@code StringJoiner}.
Note that if
+ * Returns the length of the {@code String} representation
+ * of this {@code StringJoiner}. Note that if
* no add methods have been called, then the length of the {@code
String}
* representation (either {@code prefix + suffix} or {@code
emptyValue})
* will be returned. The value should be equivalent to