Hi Stuart,

Looks good; thanks,

-Joe

On 12/3/2013 5:40 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,

Please review the following small javadoc change. The StringJoiner doc for a couple methods uses "i.e." in the first sentence, which screws up the javadoc logic that pulls the first sentence into the Method Summary. This is an editorial change to fix this up; there is no actual specification change.

Thanks!

s'marks

# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1386121046 28800
# Node ID 0bc91b9f6afd9b4dceea31ecd1036e367b365690
# Parent  75165f6c1c505ff43f7fd235a95b2e7955413b78
8029489: StringJoiner spec for setEmptyValue() and length() is malformatted
Reviewed-by: XXX

diff -r 75165f6c1c50 -r 0bc91b9f6afd src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java --- a/src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java Tue Dec 03 17:25:28 2013 -0800 +++ b/src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java Tue Dec 03 17:37:26 2013 -0800
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
     /**
* Sets the sequence of characters to be used when determining the string * representation of this {@code StringJoiner} and no elements have been - * added yet, i.e. when it is empty. A copy of the {@code emptyValue} + * added yet, that is, when it is empty. A copy of the {@code emptyValue} * parameter is made for this purpose. Note that once an add method has been * called, the {@code StringJoiner} is no longer considered empty, even if
      * the element(s) added correspond to the empty {@code String}.
@@ -228,8 +228,8 @@
     }

     /**
-     * The length of the {@code StringJoiner} value, i.e. the length of
- * {@code String} representation of the {@code StringJoiner}. Note that if
+     * Returns the length of the {@code String} representation
+     * of this {@code StringJoiner}. Note that if
* no add methods have been called, then the length of the {@code String} * representation (either {@code prefix + suffix} or {@code emptyValue})
      * will be returned. The value should be equivalent to

Reply via email to