> On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Brian Burkhalter
> <brian.burkhal...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> If it looks worth doing, I'll file another issue to track the idea.
>> I already have it on my list anyway to follow up on Alan Eliasen's
>> comment in the BigInteger code:
>>
>> * This could be changed to a more complicated caching method using
>> * {@code Future}. */
>> private static BigInteger getRadixConversionCache(int radix, int
exponent) {On 02/26/2014 02:53 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Not quite sure what that would entail. > > Paul. See, for example, p. 108 of "Java Concurrency in Practice," if one of the guys there has a copy. ;) I started writing a version of that cache using Future but it got looking a bit hairy. I submitted the very-simple version I did (which is not the one that was in the final release) because I thought anything more complex would hold up review too much. -- Alan Eliasen elia...@mindspring.com http://futureboy.us/
