Hi Brian,

Just a couple small items.

At line 4203, the type of magnitude should be byte[] instead of int[]. Whoops, I could have sworn I wrote that in my previous review, but it must have gotten dropped while I was editing. Sorry about that.

For the four compatibility fields in the serial form, the comment is

    appears in the serialized for backward compatibility

Something is missing here. Should it say "appears in the serialized form for backward compatibility" ?

The comment block at lines 4300-4306 is good. I might also add a note to say these values are compatible with older implementations.

There are some things in the serialization doc that ought to be brought up to date, 
though. Note that the docs for serialPersistentFields, readObject, and writeObject appear 
in the javadoc output, in the "Serialized Form" page, even though these members 
are private!

Isn't this controlled by options passed to the javadoc tool as opposed to 
settings in the source code?

No, serialization is "special" in that all information about the serialized form, including the docs these special private methods and fields, do appear in the Serialized Form output, regardless of the javadoc tool arguments.

I think I'll need another "thumbs up" as this has changed since Paul's approval 
was posted.

Paul is not available this week. If you want to make these corrections and then just push the changeset, it's fine by me; I think it's had enough review.

s'marks


On 3/3/14 11:37 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Hi Stuart,

Thanks for the detailed review!

Please see the refreshed webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8035279/webrev.02/ and my comments inline, 
below.

I think I'll need another "thumbs up" as this has changed since Paul's approval
was posted.

On Feb 28, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:

Thanks, Paul. I refreshed the webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8035279/webrev.01/ with the agreed upon version.

This is pretty good. After this long, strange trip through the JMM, restoring
the sentinel values to zeroes and renaming the fields to be explicit about how
they represent the actual values seems to be the best approach. Paul's
suggestion about using the term "stable value" in comments is good too.

I took a look at the serialization stuff. The actual serialized form hasn't
changed, so there should be no compatibility here with previous versions.

There are some things in the serialization doc that ought to be brought up to
date, though. Note that the docs for serialPersistentFields, readObject, and
writeObject appear in the javadoc output, in the "Serialized Form" page, even
though these members are private!

Isn't this controlled by options passed to the javadoc tool as opposed to
settings in the source code?

Per another of Paul's comments, the @serial tag should be removed from
bitCountPlusOne, bitLengthPlusOne, and lowestSetBitPlusTwo, since these fields
do not appear in the serialized representation.

Corrected.

The fields bitCount, bitLength, and lowestSetBit appear in the serialized form
only for backward compatibility and are otherwise ignored, so their
@serialField entries should just say that instead of describing how they were
formerly used. Also, firstNonzeroByteNum is missing a @serialField entry, and
it should have the same description as the others.

Corrected.

Typo at 4236-4237, it says "be\ndefault" instead of "by\ndefault".

Corrected.

The comment at lines 4242-4246 should simply be removed. The first and third
sentences are redundant with other docs. The second sentence, "The magnitude
field is used as a temporary store for the byte array that is deserialized" is
incorrect, as there is no longer a 'magnitude' field; a local is used instead.

Corrected.

The @serialData tag at line 4316 for writeObject is misused; this is really
intended for *extra* serial data written by writeObject after the
writeFields() or defaultWriteObject() call, which doesn't occur here. It might
be worth being explicit in writeObject's doc comment about writing -1's and
-2's as the values for bitCount, bitLength, lowestSetBit, and
firstNonzeroByteNum for compatibility with older implementations, even though
current implementations will ignore these values.

Corrected.

On Feb 28, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:

Woops, I forgot a couple points.

The @serial for the 'signum' field at line 130 should be removed. Note that
even though this has the same name as the field that appears in the serialized
form, the text from the @serialField tag for 'signum' that's part of the
serialPersistentFields doc comment is the one that actually appears on the
"Serialized Form" page.

Corrected.

It might be worthwhile copying the more verbose description from lines 125-128
to the @serialField tag text (lines 4206-4207) since this describes the
requirements on the serialized form more precisely. I hate redundancy in
documentation, though.

I opted for not copying the verbiage in the interested of reduced redundancy.

Note that the field names in the ObjectStreamField entries of the
serialPersistentFields array don't necessarily match the actual fields in the
class. In this case 'signum' matches but the others do not. That's ok. The
entries in this array describe the field names that are used in the serialized
output, which is essential for remaining compatible with older versions of
BigInteger.

Understood.

I checked an old version of BigInteger from 1998 and the field names used here
match the actual, serialized fields from that old version.

I verified compatibility with the Java 7 version but no older so this is good
information.

Thanks,

Brian

Reply via email to