On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalin...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Of course they are popular because these are the type names. There is no > type L; it’s an object. I don’t understand why we have to use different > names just because they are used in other namespaces. This is not a C define. They stand for JVM signatures as well as basic types. The letters are signature letters. Can we move on from this? — John
