I created an issue to track the progress and also made 2 webrevs. One for the original patch and one for the changes that have been suggested earlier in this thread by Paul and Andrej. Here we go:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048267 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.00 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.01 -Pavel On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:58, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote: > Otavio, > > I skimmed over the patches and they look ok to me. I think they would be > suitable for inclusion in jdk9/dev. > > -Chris. > > P.S. I do not currently have time to sponsor this, but I cc’ed Pavel who may > be able to help get his in. > > On 14 Jun 2014, at 14:46, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <otavioj...@java.net> > wrote: > >> Reason: The Long class has cache and using it, will save memory and will >> faster than using create new instance of Long. >> >> webrev: >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/long_value_of.zip >> >> similar: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044461 >> -- >> Otávio Gonçalves de Santana >> >> blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava >> site: http://www.otaviojava.com.br >> (11) 98255-3513 >> <sun_tools.diff><sun_security.diff><sun_nio.diff><sun_management.diff><sun_jvmstat.diff><javax_swing.diff><javax-management.diff><java_text.diff><java_awt_image.diff><internal_org_objectweb.diff><com_sun_tools.diff><com_sun_security.diff><com_sun_jmx_snmp.diff><com_sun_jdni_ldap.diff><com_sun_imageio.diff> >