This looks fine.
On Jul 30 2014, at 08:45 , Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote: > A trivial one-liner for a missing null check for the given operator after the > changes for 8047795, which now always passes a non-null operator to the > underlying list.replaceAll. > > The original test has been updated in it's existing style to cover this. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8053938/webrev.00/webrev/ > > -Chris.
