Hi,
it appears I might have been unclear that this was a (re-)review request
- not a request
for approval - since we need to make the public API introduced in
8041972 private for 8u.
After some confusion on my part, it turns out the appropriate place to
re-review these
changes are actually on this list[1].
/Claes
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-August/001642.html
On 08/11/2014 06:15 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
I want to request backports of 8050114 [1], 8041972 [2] and 8006627[3]
to 8u-dev.
The patches apply cleanly when pushed in the sequence listed.
[1] Expose Integer/Long formatUnsigned methods internally
- jdk9 patch appliescleanly to jdk8u-dev
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050114
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8050114/webrev.2
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/7f056c2a6c54
[2] Add improved parse methods for Long/Integer
- public API methods made package private and exposed via JavaLangAccess
- rolled typos fixes found and reported under JDK-8054828 into this patch
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041972
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8041972/backport.2
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/127da56ff224
[3] UUID to/from String performance should be improved by reducing
object allocations
- non-public parseLong method now accessed via JavaLangAccess
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006627
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8006627/backport.0
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/3b298c230549
Thanks!
/Claes
