Hi Alan, Otavio,
I'm very delighted that Otavio wants to help! I'm totally fine with
updating the source to a higher source level, though diverging from the
upstream projects in the process. I was only saying that it's currently
not a high priority for me and that I don't have circles. There's a
plenty of room for improvement in the jaxp sources, the problem then is
that you'd need to find a sponsor. I see that the discussion on one of
your previous proposals (e.g. Replace concat String to append in
StringBuilder parameters) lasted a month, have you found a sponsor for
that yet?
Thanks,
Joe
On 9/12/2014 4:08 AM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote:
I haven't acess to cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net> yet.
But I uploaded another way.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/jaxp/string_buffer_2_string_builder/index.html
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com
<mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On 12/09/2014 10:40, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote:
@Alan
Yes, I would like help the jaxp in openjdk project.
But I thought that were different projects, but how are the same.
I believe will the same process.
So I will waiting to a sponsor.
I understand it can be a bit confusing. In summary, the JAXP
project on java.net <http://java.net> is dead and the development
is now in OpenJDK.
I can't speak for Joe (Huizhe) but I think part of this point was
that he didn't want to have the Xerces/Xalan code diverge too much
from the upstream Apache projects. If so then this shouldn't
prevent doing clean-up on the non-Apache code in the jaxp
repository. Maybe you could trim back to the changes and send them
to someone that can upload them to cr.openjdk.java.net
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net> for discussion.
-Alan
--
Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/
twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava
site: _http://about.me/otaviojava_
55 (11) 98255-3513
