On 30/10/2014 6:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 29/10/2014 21:15, Mario Torre wrote:+1 We should have spotted it in the review though.We should but the ultimate rat catcher should be the tests, it's possible that we have a hole there.
Not sure how the presence or absence of CLOEXEC would be visible to any test - especially given all the other uses of raw open in the JDK sources.
David
